
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.3 by Marek Hlavac, Social Policy Institute. E-mail: marek.hlavac at gmail.com
% Date and time: Wed, Feb 07, 2024 - 6:45:50 PM
\begin{table}[H] \centering 
  \caption{No evidence of ex post protection in Vietnam across all PAPI subscore specifications} 
  \label{robust_expost_papi_vn} 
\scriptsize 
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{1pt}}lcccccc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 & \multicolumn{6}{c}{\textit{Dependent variable:}} \\ 
\cline{2-7} 
\\[-1.8ex] & \multicolumn{6}{c}{Sanction level log odds} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2) & (3) & (4) & (5) & (6)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Province's ties to incumbent GS & $-$0.104 & $-$0.126 & $-$0.074 & $-$0.022 & $-$0.120 & $-$0.128 \\ 
  & (0.850) & (0.855) & (0.864) & (0.873) & (0.848) & (0.838) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Investigated office level (district) & $-$1.784$^{***}$ & $-$1.780$^{***}$ & $-$1.766$^{***}$ & $-$1.762$^{***}$ & $-$1.739$^{***}$ & $-$1.733$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.444) & (0.443) & (0.444) & (0.445) & (0.443) & (0.448) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Investigated office level (province) & $-$2.331$^{***}$ & $-$2.375$^{***}$ & $-$2.324$^{***}$ & $-$2.323$^{***}$ & $-$2.307$^{***}$ & $-$2.269$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.529) & (0.525) & (0.526) & (0.526) & (0.521) & (0.530) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Investigated office level (center) & $-$2.725$^{**}$ & $-$2.682$^{**}$ & $-$2.805$^{**}$ & $-$2.895$^{**}$ & $-$2.688$^{**}$ & $-$2.522$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.867) & (0.870) & (0.886) & (0.897) & (0.864) & (0.904) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Official left office & 0.174 & 0.223 & 0.199 & 0.213 & 0.200 & 0.161 \\ 
  & (0.327) & (0.331) & (0.329) & (0.328) & (0.327) & (0.326) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 IC level (district) & $-$0.869 & $-$0.978 & $-$0.843 & $-$0.850 & $-$0.632 & $-$1.053 \\ 
  & (1.688) & (1.686) & (1.689) & (1.687) & (1.719) & (1.691) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 IC level (province) & $-$0.767 & $-$0.886 & $-$0.714 & $-$0.712 & $-$0.539 & $-$0.957 \\ 
  & (1.692) & (1.696) & (1.700) & (1.695) & (1.721) & (1.702) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 IC level (center) & 1.464 & 1.297 & 1.533 & 1.571 & 1.690 & 1.183 \\ 
  & (1.773) & (1.776) & (1.783) & (1.779) & (1.798) & (1.795) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Serious violation & 1.124$^{***}$ & 1.160$^{***}$ & 1.113$^{***}$ & 1.119$^{***}$ & 1.143$^{***}$ & 1.119$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.326) & (0.328) & (0.325) & (0.326) & (0.329) & (0.323) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Lagged GDP (logged) & $-$0.332 & $-$0.303 & $-$0.374 & $-$0.447 & $-$0.296 & $-$0.243 \\ 
  & (0.442) & (0.435) & (0.484) & (0.533) & (0.427) & (0.376) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 2011 population (logged) & 0.862 & 0.796 & 0.878 & 0.881 & 0.834 & 0.888 \\ 
  & (0.608) & (0.610) & (0.639) & (0.674) & (0.598) & (0.543) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 Lagged targeted transfer & 1.973$^{**}$ & 1.893$^{*}$ & 1.963$^{**}$ & 1.910$^{*}$ & 2.004$^{**}$ & 2.017$^{**}$ \\ 
  & (0.759) & (0.742) & (0.740) & (0.755) & (0.723) & (0.714) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 PAPI unweighted score & $-$0.021 &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  & (0.113) &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 PAPI vertical accountability &  & $-$0.438 &  &  &  &  \\ 
  &  & (0.445) &  &  &  &  \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 PAPI control of corruption &  &  & $-$0.149 &  &  &  \\ 
  &  &  & (0.334) &  &  &  \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 PAPI limits on public sector corruption &  &  &  & $-$0.701 &  &  \\ 
  &  &  &  & (0.897) &  &  \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 PAPI willingness to fight corruption &  &  &  &  & $-$1.119 &  \\ 
  &  &  &  &  & (1.421) &  \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
 PAPI basic infrastructure &  &  &  &  &  & $-$0.665 \\ 
  &  &  &  &  &  & (0.843) \\ 
  & & & & & & \\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
Year FE & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes \\ 
Observations & 342 & 342 & 340 & 340 & 340 & 342 \\ 
\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\textit{Note:}  & \multicolumn{6}{r}{$^{*}$p$<$0.05; $^{**}$p$<$0.01; $^{***}$p$<$0.001} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
